← Back to Day 8
Story Time
When the tech giant announced a merger with its biggest rival, the media immediately called it a potential monopoly. Executives described it as a lucrative opportunity, promising new markets and higher profits. But behind the scenes, logistics teams struggled with aligning supply chains, HR systems, and operating expenses that doubled overnight. For employees, excitement mixed with fear as they tried to mull over what the future might bring.
In the boardroom, the CEO was seen by some as a visionary, and by others as a megalomaniac who craved absolute control. His sudden outburst during a press conference, where he dismissed critics as “short-sighted,” didn’t help his image. Analysts accused him of trying to obfuscate the risks by burying real numbers under layers of jargon. Meanwhile, the CFO quietly mulls alternative strategies to reduce costs, including more outsourcing, though that threatened jobs at home.
Among the employees, reactions varied. Some were too naive to see the dangers, celebrating early stock gains as though success were guaranteed. Others grew melancholy, worried that friends would lose jobs or entire departments would disappear. The atmosphere was tense, filled with whispered doubts and hallway debates.
In one corner of the office, a self-proclaimed misanthrope watched the chaos with grim satisfaction. He believed people were greedy by nature and that the narrowing gap between promises and reality would soon collapse morale. “This isn’t progress,” he muttered, “it’s just the same hunger for power in a shinier suit.”
Still, for all the conflict, some employees saw opportunity. They believed that if handled wisely, the merger could balance efficiency with innovation. But they also knew that beneath the layers of strategy, incentives, and cost-saving plans, it was people—not numbers—who carried the true weight of change.
In the boardroom, the CEO was seen by some as a visionary, and by others as a megalomaniac who craved absolute control. His sudden outburst during a press conference, where he dismissed critics as “short-sighted,” didn’t help his image. Analysts accused him of trying to obfuscate the risks by burying real numbers under layers of jargon. Meanwhile, the CFO quietly mulls alternative strategies to reduce costs, including more outsourcing, though that threatened jobs at home.
Among the employees, reactions varied. Some were too naive to see the dangers, celebrating early stock gains as though success were guaranteed. Others grew melancholy, worried that friends would lose jobs or entire departments would disappear. The atmosphere was tense, filled with whispered doubts and hallway debates.
In one corner of the office, a self-proclaimed misanthrope watched the chaos with grim satisfaction. He believed people were greedy by nature and that the narrowing gap between promises and reality would soon collapse morale. “This isn’t progress,” he muttered, “it’s just the same hunger for power in a shinier suit.”
Still, for all the conflict, some employees saw opportunity. They believed that if handled wisely, the merger could balance efficiency with innovation. But they also knew that beneath the layers of strategy, incentives, and cost-saving plans, it was people—not numbers—who carried the true weight of change.